Universe Timeline of Matter Formation
The Universe formed all matter through a sorted and sifted set of mono-charge joinings that allowed only the strongest mono-charges joinings to occur at each sequential cooling step. It did this by incorporating:
· all basic Charge Force Laws and Rules;
· the initial Quantization Event(s) resulting in high KE mono-charges;
· all F-SCoTt processes including-
o a cooling kinetic energy Universe environment with time,
o imbalanced consumption of weaker opposite charges for neutralization, and
o the growing importance of net gravity forces over singular charge forces over time
That Universe Timeline of matter formation is shown in Figures 3-8 and described below by the A-R codes (center left of Figure 4):
A. Basic, static, neutral CHARGE with no type and all charge strength existed at TIME zero. All physical STEF Universe (SPACE : TIME : CHARGE : FORCE) relationships were in place at this time;
B. Basic earliest Universe static CHARGE was first quantized or split into two charge types of equal charge strengths. Those 2 charge types are called positive (+) and negative (-), by convention. It is important to note that this type differential follows into magnetic poles, chemical pH, and properties of all matter. Step 1 in the Big Bang;
C. That original basic static and neutral CHARGE, now with 2 charge types, was then unevenly or statically skewed quantized by charge strength into mono-charges within each charge type in that earliest Universe. Those resultant quantized mono-charge strengths ranged from those that seeded black holes down to sub-photonic mono-charges. That uneven quantization event was- 1) discrete narrow bands of charge strengths (due to resonance effects?) and/ or 2) continuous distributions with pertubations. Step 2 in the Big Bang;
D. Due the previous Event C and a proposed temporary diminishment or reduction of attraction charge force OR enhancement of repulsion charge force (theorized ‘near-charge force inversion’), all tightly packed newly quantized mono-charges were given high velocities, creating an extremely high kinetic earliest Universe environment. Step 3 in the Big, Bang, where all 3 B-C-D stages are possibly and collectively called the ‘Big Bang Event’;
E. In that very high kinetic energy earliest Universe environment, NO mono-charges could stably join together. That extreme condition forced all mono-charges to become fully dispersed within the confines of SPACE, as shown in Figure 5;
F. With TIME, the early Universe kinetically cooled (possibly, initially only by SPACE expansion) sufficient such that only the most immensely strongest mono-charges could stably join together using singular attraction charge force. Those earliest joinings were dominated by positive charge types (note uneven charge strength distribution by charge type in Figure 2) that were many 1000 times stronger than theorized as now existing on earth. Those joined immensely heavy elemental charged particles are theorized to have seeded the formation of Black Holes (BHs), as shown as the right di-charge/ bi-charge particle joining in Figure 6.
Figure 4. Universe Time and Kinetic Energy Sequences Forming Matter
G. With more TIME and Universe cooling, but now partially caused by strong mono-charge joinings and some SPACE expansion, any remaining weaker, but still immensely strong charge strength mono-charges could stably join together to seed Stars, following those same F-SCoTt processes;
Figure 5- Independent Mono-Charges in the Earliest Universe
(Colors represent different Charge Types and Charge Strengths)
H. With much more TIME and Universe cooling (joinings and expansion) weaker earthly quark strength level mono-charges could stably form ELEMENTAL QUARK PARTICLES with net positive charges, seeding the heavier baryons, seen as the right di-charge / bi-charge particle joining in Figure 6. In this segment of time some unidentified charges (RA) are theorized to have existed that later caused structural instability in higher joinings (quarks>protons>heavier nuclei) seen as radioactivity instabilities;
As a note in looking ahead in time - it took further cooling and much more TIME for those joined immensely strong positively charged particles (i.e. possessing a strong positive net charge) to attract and join with many more weaker negative mono-charges to become overall charge neutral, due to an ‘inordinate consumption of weaker charges’. This neutralization process increased net gravity forces while decreasing singular net positive charge forces coming from such growing black holes.
I. Due to the uneven distribution of charge strengths for both charge types, and now a relative increase in the remaining population of weaker negative mono-charges, later charge joinings converted to negative charge domination;
J. With much more TIME and Universe cooling (joinings and expansion), the remaining weaker quark level mono-charges could stably form later ELEMENTAL QUARK PARTICLES with net negative charges, seeding some later baryons causing them to have higher electron (and other negative charge) conductivity. This is seen as the left di-charge/bi-charge particle in Figure 6;
Quark particles possess too high a NET charge to exist in a free state in the current Universe. If freed, such strong charges would charge force disrupt all nearby atomic and molecular joinings, as seen in the CERN Higgs boson/ field result, better described as ‘detrital’ (i.e. a temporary unstable random charge joinings from such high Kinetic Energy collisions). MC Physics further suggests that in the current Universe, quarks and even protons are irrelevant, as their higher charged constituent mono-charges actually determine the nature of all matter.
Figure 6. Elemental Particle
(Color = Charge Type, Size = Charge Strength)
K. At this Universe age in TIME and with a much KE cooler environment, composite or poly-mono-charge particles could stably form by joinings of strong elemental particles. Specifically, net positive quark particles could ‘flip’ (or just rotate) to directly join with net negative quark particles forming COMPOSITE PROTON PARTICLES with an overall net positive charge. A net positive proton composite particle formed by that process is shown in Figure 7. Note- protons have a much higher mass (from their quark mono-charges) but a much lower net charge strength than possessed by their individual quark level mono-charges and quark particles;
L. At this later Universe age, with passing TIME, a much cooler Universe existed due to increased joinings of strong charges (and possibly continued SPACE expansion), causing net gravity forces to become dominant over singular charge forces in matter formation.
The flipping/ rotating step for particles to directly join other particles in an alternating internal mono-charge type arrangement or structure, allows opposite-charge type mono-charges from each particle to ‘touch’ and like-type mono-charges from the other particle to be kept further apart, therefore forming net strong charge force joined composite particles. This high z exponent matter forming process is repeated throughout all matter formation levels. This F-SCoTt process is further evidence supporting the existence of mono-charges.
Figure 7. Composite Proton Particle, Hydrogen Nuclei
(Colors represent Charge Type, various Charge Strengths possible)
M. With even more TIME and a much, much cooler Universe, protons could ‘flip’ (or even rotate) and directly join other protons so that opposite-type mono-charges from each proton could ‘touch’ and like-type mono-charges from each proton were kept further apart, providing a strong net attraction charge force for the joined NUCLEI COMPOSITE PARTICLES, still with a positive charge.
With even more cooling, even weaker electronic, neutrino and photonic individual mono-charges (both charge types) could join strong net positive charged quarks and composite proton particles leading up to simple box or rectangular type nuclei in Figure 8A and B. Note that ‘neutrons’ are not needed, as they are just joinings of weaker charges to a proton to cause overall charge neutralization.
Later and with more KE cooling, weaker force joined long-linear, more reactive cylindrical and spine nuclei structures could form, examples shown in Figure 8 C and D. Low atomic mass nuclei with high KE that were more isolated by distance could have avoided black holes and even higher joinings to remain as simple nuclei, e.g. Hydrogen (6 MCs) shown in Figure 7 and Helium (24 MCs) shown in Figures 8-A and B. The weaker mono-charges needed for neutralization or stability are not shown for simplicity.
N. With much more TIME and Universe cooling (now mostly from SPACE expansion, if any) even weaker electron level strength mono-charges could stably form free (non-atomically bound) ELEMENTAL ELECTRON PARTICLES with a negative charge domination. Note that those electron strength negative mono-charges were already joining higher order particles/nuclei for charge neutralizations (e.g. negative mono-charges joining positive charged nuclei to form neutral atoms);
O. Again, due to the uneven distribution of charge strengths by charge type, and at this point in the age of the Universe, the consumption of weaker positive mono-charges the matter forming process was converted back to positive domination;
Figure 8-ABCD Simple (Helium @ 24 MC+) Nuclei in various possible Configurations
(Colors represent Charge Type only, not Charge Strengths)
A. 3X3X4 MC - Block Nuclei B. 2X3X6 MC- Rectangular Nuclei
C. 6X3 MC Cylindrical Nuclei, top D: 6X3 Cylindrical Nuclei, ortho
P. With much more TIME and Universe cooling (mostly only SPACE expansion, if any) even weaker strength mono-charges could stably form ELEMENTAL NEUTRINO particles with positive dominated charges, but still with an overall neutral charge. This positive charge domination feature of neutrinos, even if the particle is overall charge neutral, provides a strong reason (like-type repel charge forces) that they can pass through positive dominated baryon matter mostly unhindered;
Q. With much more TIME and Universe cooling (mostly only SPACE expansion, if any) to near our current TIME, another charge domination reversal occurred to negative charge types. This allowed even the weakest known strength mono-charges to stably form ELEMENTAL PHOTON PARTICLES with negative dominated charges, but still with an overall neutral charge. This negative charge domination feature, even if overall neutral, provides a strong reason that photons easily interact with, are affected by and are absorbed by (mostly) positive dominated baryon matter; and
The strongest evidence of mono-charge existence can be seen in the simplest elemental photon particles with a substructure of two (or more) opposite type mono-charges that are relativistically rotating at frequency while the particle is relativistically travelling at c. A real physical model of photons is provided in references [1, 2, 3]. No other physical model of real photons is known to exist in the scientific community.
R. Not even in the current TIME and cool Universe can the remaining weaker mono-charges, that are even weaker than photons, stably join together to form free particles. If they did, these may be called the tachyons of Star Trek fame or the ‘gravitons’ recently (2015-2016) measured at LIGO. However, even then, these very weak charges do play a critical role in final charge neutralization of all matter and in heat transfer (via mass and Kinetic Energy transfers).